Dermatoscopic patterns of cutaneous metastases: A multicentre cross-sectional study of the International Dermoscopy Society.

BACKGROUND: The detection of cutaneous metastases (CMs) from various primary tumours represents a diagnostic challenge. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the general characteristics and dermatoscopic features of CMs from different primary tumours. METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre, descriptive, cross-sectional study of biopsy-proven CMs. RESULTS: We included 583 patients (247 females, median age: 64 years, 25%-75% percentiles: 54-74 years) with 632 CMs, of which 52.2% (n = 330) were local, and 26.7% (n = 169) were distant. The most common primary tumours were melanomas (n = 474) and breast cancer (n = 59). Most non-melanoma CMs were non-pigmented (n = 151, 95.6%). Of 169 distant metastases, 54 (32.0%) appeared on the head and neck region. On dermatoscopy, pigmented melanoma metastases were frequently structureless blue (63.6%, n = 201), while amelanotic metastases were typified by linear serpentine vessels and a white structureless pattern. No significant difference was found between amelanotic melanoma metastases and CMs of other primary tumours. CONCLUSIONS: The head and neck area is a common site for distant CMs. Our study confirms that most pigmented melanoma metastasis are structureless blue on dermatoscopy and may mimic blue nevi. Amelanotic metastases are typified by linear serpentine vessels and a white structureless pattern, regardless of the primary tumour.

Position statement of the EADV Artificial Intelligence (AI) Task Force on AI-assisted smartphone apps and web-based services for skin disease.

BACKGROUND: As the use of smartphones continues to surge globally, mobile applications (apps) have become a powerful tool for healthcare engagement. Prominent among these are dermatology apps powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), which provide immediate diagnostic guidance and educational resources for skin diseases, including skin cancer. OBJECTIVE: This article, authored by the EADV AI Task Force, seeks to offer insights and recommendations for the present and future deployment of AI-assisted smartphone applications (apps) and web-based services for skin diseases with emphasis on skin cancer detection. METHODS: An initial position statement was drafted on a comprehensive literature review, which was subsequently refined through two rounds of digital discussions and meticulous feedback by the EADV AI Task Force, ensuring its accuracy, clarity and relevance. RESULTS: Eight key considerations were identified, including risks associated with inaccuracy and improper user education, a decline in professional skills, the influence of non-medical commercial interests, data security, direct and indirect costs, regulatory approval and the necessity of multidisciplinary implementation. Following these considerations, three main recommendations were formulated: (1) to ensure user trust, app developers should prioritize transparency in data quality, accuracy, intended use, privacy and costs; (2) Apps and web-based services should ensure a uniform user experience for diverse groups of patients; (3) European authorities should adopt a rigorous and consistent regulatory framework for dermatology apps to ensure their safety and accuracy for users. CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of AI-assisted smartphone apps and web-based services in diagnosing and treating skin diseases has the potential to greatly benefit patients in their dermatology journeys. By prioritising innovation, fostering collaboration and implementing effective regulations, we can ensure the successful integration of these apps into clinical practice.

Expert Agreement on the Presence and Spatial Localization of Melanocytic Features in Dermoscopy.

Dermoscopy aids in melanoma detection; however, agreement on dermoscopic features, including those of high clinical relevance, remains poor. In this study, we attempted to evaluate agreement among experts on exemplar images not only for the presence of melanocytic-specific features but also for spatial localization. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study. Dermoscopy images exhibiting at least 1 of 31 melanocytic-specific features were submitted by 25 world experts as exemplars. Using a web-based platform that allows for image markup of specific contrast-defined regions (superpixels), 20 expert readers annotated 248 dermoscopic images in collections of 62 images. Each collection was reviewed by five independent readers. A total of 4,507 feature observations were performed. Good-to-excellent agreement was found for 14 of 31 features (45.2%), with eight achieving excellent agreement (Gwet's AC >0.75) and seven of them being melanoma-specific features. These features were peppering/granularity (0.91), shiny white streaks (0.89), typical pigment network (0.83), blotch irregular (0.82), negative network (0.81), irregular globules (0.78), dotted vessels (0.77), and blue-whitish veil (0.76). By utilizing an exemplar dataset, a good-to-excellent agreement was found for 14 features that have previously been shown useful in discriminating nevi from melanoma. All images are public (www.isic-archive.com) and can be used for education, scientific communication, and machine learning experiments.

Assessment of Diagnostic Performance of Dermatologists Cooperating With a Convolutional Neural Network in a Prospective Clinical Study: Human With Machine.

Importance: Studies suggest that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform equally to trained dermatologists in skin lesion classification tasks. Despite the approval of the first neural networks for clinical use, prospective studies demonstrating benefits of human with machine cooperation are lacking. Objective: To assess whether dermatologists benefit from cooperation with a market-approved CNN in classifying melanocytic lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective diagnostic 2-center study, dermatologists performed skin cancer screenings using naked-eye examination and dermoscopy. Dermatologists graded suspect melanocytic lesions by the probability of malignancy (range 0-1, threshold for malignancy ≥0.5) and indicated management decisions (no action, follow-up, excision). Next, dermoscopic images of suspect lesions were assessed by a market-approved CNN, Moleanalyzer Pro (FotoFinder Systems). The CNN malignancy scores (range 0-1, threshold for malignancy ≥0.5) were transferred to dermatologists with the request to re-evaluate lesions and revise initial decisions in consideration of CNN results. Reference diagnoses were based on histopathologic examination in 125 (54.8%) lesions or, in the case of nonexcised lesions, on clinical follow-up data and expert consensus. Data were collected from October 2020 to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists alone and dermatologists cooperating with the CNN. Accuracy and receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) were considered as additional measures. Results: A total of 22 dermatologists detected 228 suspect melanocytic lesions (190 nevi, 38 melanomas) in 188 patients (mean [range] age, 53.4 [19-91] years; 97 [51.6%] male patients). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity significantly improved when dermatologists additionally integrated CNN results into decision-making (mean sensitivity from 84.2% [95% CI, 69.6%-92.6%] to 100.0% [95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%]; P = .03; mean specificity from 72.1% [95% CI, 65.3%-78.0%] to 83.7% [95% CI, 77.8%-88.3%]; P < .001; mean accuracy from 74.1% [95% CI, 68.1%-79.4%] to 86.4% [95% CI, 81.3%-90.3%]; P < .001; and mean ROC AUC from 0.895 [95% CI, 0.836-0.954] to 0.968 [95% CI, 0.948-0.988]; P = .005). In addition, the CNN alone achieved a comparable sensitivity, higher specificity, and higher diagnostic accuracy compared with dermatologists alone in classifying melanocytic lesions. Moreover, unnecessary excisions of benign nevi were reduced by 19.2%, from 104 (54.7%) of 190 benign nevi to 84 nevi when dermatologists cooperated with the CNN (P < .001). Most lesions were examined by dermatologists with 2 to 5 years (96, 42.1%) or less than 2 years of experience (78, 34.2%); others (54, 23.7%) were evaluated by dermatologists with more than 5 years of experience. Dermatologists with less dermoscopy experience cooperating with the CNN had the most diagnostic improvement compared with more experienced dermatologists. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective diagnostic study, these findings suggest that dermatologists may improve their performance when they cooperate with the market-approved CNN and that a broader application of this human with machine approach could be beneficial for dermatologists and patients.

Implementation of a dermatoscopy curriculum during residency at Augsburg University Hospital in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To date, there is no structured program for dermatoscopy training during residency in Germany. Whether and how much dermatoscopy training is acquired is left to the initiative of each resident, although dermatoscopy is one of the core competencies of dermatological training and daily practice. The aim of the study was to establish a structured dermatoscopy curriculum during residency at the University Hospital Augsburg. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An online platform with dermatoscopy modules was created, accessible regardless of time and place. Practical skills were acquired under the personal guidance of a dermatoscopy expert. Participants were tested on their level of knowledge before and after completing the modules. Test scores on management decisions and correct dermatoscopic diagnosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Results of 28 participants showed improvements in management decisions from pre- to posttest (74.0% vs. 89.4%) and in dermatoscopic accuracy (65.0% vs. 85.6%). Pre- vs. posttest differences in test score (7.05/10 vs. 8.94/10 points) and correct diagnosis were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The dermatoscopy curriculum increases the number of correct management decisions and dermatoscopy diagnoses. This will result in more skin cancers being detected, and fewer benign lesions being excised. The curriculum can be offered to other dermatology training centers and medical professionals.

Observational study investigating the level of support from a convolutional neural network in face and scalp lesions deemed diagnostically 'unclear' by dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of face and scalp lesions (FSL) is challenging due to overlapping features. Dermatologists encountering diagnostically 'unclear' lesions may benefit from artificial intelligence support via convolutional neural networks (CNN). METHODS: In a web-based classification task, dermatologists (n = 64) diagnosed a convenience sample of 100 FSL as 'benign', 'malignant', or 'unclear' and indicated their management decisions ('no action', 'follow-up', 'treatment/excision'). A market-approved CNN (Moleanalyzer-Pro®, FotoFinder Systems, Germany) was applied for binary classifications (benign/malignant) of dermoscopic images. RESULTS: After reviewing one dermoscopic image per case, dermatologists labelled 562 of 6400 diagnoses (8.8%) as 'unclear' and mostly managed these by follow-up examinations (57.3%, n = 322) or excisions (42.5%, n = 239). Management was incorrect in 58.8% of 291 truly malignant cases (171 'follow-up' or 'no action') and 43.9% of 271 truly benign cases (119 'excision'). Accepting CNN classifications in unclear cases would have reduced false management decisions to 4.1% in truly malignant and 31.7% in truly benign lesions (both p < 0.01). After receiving full case information 239 diagnoses (3.7%) remained 'unclear' to dermatologists, now triggering more excisions (72.0%) than follow-up examinations (28.0%). These management decisions were incorrect in 32.8% of 116 truly malignant cases and 76.4% of 123 truly benign cases. Accepting CNN classifications would have reduced false management decisions to 6.9% in truly malignant lesions and to 38.2% in truly benign cases (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists mostly managed diagnostically 'unclear' FSL by treatment/excision or follow-up examination. Following CNN classifications as guidance in unclear cases seems suitable to significantly reduce incorrect decisions.

Identification of M4205─A Highly Selective Inhibitor of KIT Mutations for Treatment of Unresectable Metastatic or Recurrent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

The treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) driven by activating mutations in the KIT gene is a prime example of targeted therapy for treatment of cancer. The approval of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has significantly improved patient survival, but emerging resistance under treatment and relapse is observed. Several additional KIT inhibitors have been approved; still, there is a high unmet need for KIT inhibitors with high selectivity and broad coverage of all clinically relevant KIT mutants. An imidazopyridine hit featuring excellent kinase selectivity was identified in a high-throughput screen (HTS) and optimized to the clinical candidate M4205 (IDRX-42). This molecule has a superior profile compared to approved drugs, suggesting a best-in-class potential for recurrent and metastatic GISTs driven by KIT mutations.

MSC-1186, a Highly Selective Pan-SRPK Inhibitor Based on an Exceptionally Decorated Benzimidazole-Pyrimidine Core.

The highly conserved catalytic sites in protein kinases make it difficult to identify ATP competitive inhibitors with kinome-wide selectivity. Serendipitously, during a dedicated fragment campaign for the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a scaffold that had lost its initial FAK affinity showed remarkable potency and selectivity for serine-arginine-protein kinases 1-3 (SRPK1-3). Non-conserved interactions with the uniquely structured hinge region of the SRPK family were the key drivers of the exclusive selectivity of the discovered fragment hit. Structure-guided medicinal chemistry efforts led to the SRPK inhibitor MSC-1186, which fulfills all hallmarks of a reversible chemical probe, including nanomolar cellular potency and excellent kinome-wide selectivity. The combination of MSC-1186 with CDC2-like kinase (CLK) inhibitors showed additive attenuation of SR-protein phosphorylation compared to the single agents. MSC-1186 and negative control (MSC-5360) are chemical probes available via the Structural Genomics Consortium chemical probe program (https://www.sgc-ffm.uni-frankfurt.de/).

Vascular Diameter as Clue for the Diagnosis of Clinically and/or Dermoscopically Equivocal Pigmented and Non-Pigmented Basal Cell Carcinomas and Nodular Melanomas.

Background and objectives: Dermoscopy is a useful tool for the early and non-invasive diagnosis of skin malignancies. Besides many progresses, heavily pigmented and amelanotic skin tumors remain still a challenge. We aimed to investigate by dermoscopy if distinctive morphologic characteristics of vessels may help the diagnosis of equivocal nodular lesions. Materials and Methods: A collage of 16 challenging clinical and dermoscopic images of 8 amelanotic and 8 heavily pigmented nodular melanomas and basal cell carcinomas was sent via e-mail to 8 expert dermoscopists. Results: Dermoscopy improved diagnostic accuracy in 40 cases. Vessels were considered the best clue in 71 cases. Focusing on the diameter of vessels improved diagnosis in 5 cases. Conclusions: vascular diameter in addition to morphology and arrangement may be a useful dermoscopic clue for the differential diagnosis of clinically equivocal nodular malignant tumors.

Indications for Digital Monitoring of Patients With Multiple Nevi: Recommendations from the International Dermoscopy Society.

Introduction: In patients with multiple nevi, sequential imaging using total body skin photography (TBSP) coupled with digital dermoscopy (DD) documentation reduces unnecessary excisions and improves the early detection of melanoma. Correct patient selection is essential for optimizing the efficacy of this diagnostic approach. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to identify, via expert consensus, the best indications for TBSP and DD follow-up. Methods: This study was performed on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society (IDS). We attained consensus by using an e-Delphi methodology. The panel of participants included international experts in dermoscopy. In each Delphi round, experts were asked to select from a list of indications for TBSP and DD. Results: Expert consensus was attained after 3 rounds of Delphi. Participants considered a total nevus count of 60 or more nevi or the presence of a CDKN2A mutation sufficient to refer the patient for digital monitoring. Patients with more than 40 nevi were only considered an indication in case of personal history of melanoma or red hair and/or a MC1R mutation or history of organ transplantation. Conclusions: Our recommendations support clinicians in choosing appropriate follow-up regimens for patients with multiple nevi and in applying the time-consuming procedure of sequential imaging more efficiently. Further studies and real-life data are needed to confirm the usefulness of this list of indications in clinical practice.

Does sex matter? Analysis of sex-related differences in the diagnostic performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network for skin cancer detection.

BACKGROUND: Advances in biomedical artificial intelligence may introduce or perpetuate sex and gender discriminations. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have proven a dermatologist-level performance in image classification tasks but have not been assessed for sex and gender biases that may affect training data and diagnostic performance. In this study, we investigated sex-related imbalances in training data and diagnostic performance of a market-approved CNN for skin cancer classification (Moleanalyzer Pro®, Fotofinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany). METHODS: We screened open-access dermoscopic image repositories widely used for CNN training for distribution of sex. Moreover, the sex-related diagnostic performance of the market-approved CNN was tested in 1549 dermoscopic images stratified by sex (female n = 773; male n = 776). RESULTS: Most open-access repositories showed a marked under-representation of images originating from female (40%) versus male (60%) patients. Despite these imbalances and well-known sex-related differences in skin anatomy or skin-directed behaviour, the tested CNN achieved a comparable sensitivity of 87.0% [80.9%-91.3%] versus 87.1% [81.1%-91.4%], specificity of 98.7% [97.4%-99.3%] versus 96.9% [95.2%-98.0%] and ROC-AUC of 0.984 [0.975-0.993] versus 0.979 [0.969-0.988] in dermoscopic images of female versus male origin, respectively. In the sample at hand, sex-related differences in ROC-AUCs were not statistically significant in the per-image analysis nor in an additional per-individual analysis (p ≥ 0.59). CONCLUSION: Design and training of artificial intelligence algorithms for medical applications should generally acknowledge sex and gender dimensions. Despite sex-related imbalances in open-access training data, the diagnostic performance of the tested CNN showed no sex-related bias in the classification of skin lesions.

Clinical and Dermoscopic Features of Melanocytic Lesions on the Face Versus the External Ear.

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma of the external ear is a rare condition accounting for 7-20% of all melanomas of the head and neck region. They present classical features of extra-facial melanomas clinically and dermoscopically. In contrast, facial melanomas show peculiar patterns in dermoscopy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether there are clinical and/or dermoscopic differences in melanocytic lesions located either at the external ear or on the face. METHODS: In this retrospective study we reviewed an image database for clinical and dermoscopic images of melanomas and nevi located either on the face or at the level of the external ear. RESULTS: 65 patients (37 men; 63.8%) with 65 lesions were included. We found no significant differences in comparing face melanomas with melanomas at the level of the external ear, neither clinically nor dermoscopically. However, we provided evidence for differences in some clinical and dermoscopic features of melanomas and nevi of the external ear. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we reported no significant differences in comparing melanomas on the face with melanomas of the external ear, both clinically and dermoscopically. Furthermore, we provided data on clinical and dermoscopic differences comparing nevi and melanoma of the external ear.

Skin cancer classification via convolutional neural networks: systematic review of studies involving human experts.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have compared the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models for automated skin cancer classification to human experts, thus setting the cornerstone for a successful translation of AI-based tools into clinicopathological practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to systematically analyse the current state of research on reader studies involving melanoma and to assess their potential clinical relevance by evaluating three main aspects: test set characteristics (holdout/out-of-distribution data set, composition), test setting (experimental/clinical, inclusion of metadata) and representativeness of participating clinicians. METHODS: PubMed, Medline and ScienceDirect were screened for peer-reviewed studies published between 2017 and 2021 and dealing with AI-based skin cancer classification involving melanoma. The search terms skin cancer classification, deep learning, convolutional neural network (CNN), melanoma (detection), digital biomarkers, histopathology and whole slide imaging were combined. Based on the search results, only studies that considered direct comparison of AI results with clinicians and had a diagnostic classification as their main objective were included. RESULTS: A total of 19 reader studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 CNN-based approaches addressed the classification of dermoscopic images; 6 concentrated on the classification of clinical images, whereas 2 dermatopathological studies utilised digitised histopathological whole slide images. CONCLUSIONS: All 19 included studies demonstrated superior or at least equivalent performance of CNN-based classifiers compared with clinicians. However, almost all studies were conducted in highly artificial settings based exclusively on single images of the suspicious lesions. Moreover, test sets mainly consisted of holdout images and did not represent the full range of patient populations and melanoma subtypes encountered in clinical practice.

Collective human intelligence outperforms artificial intelligence in a skin lesion classification task.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) enable accurate diagnosis of medical images and perform on or above the level of individual physicians. Recently, collective human intelligence (CoHI) was shown to exceed the diagnostic accuracy of individuals. Thus, diagnostic performance of CoHI (120 dermatologists) versus individual dermatologists versus two state-of-the-art CNN was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional reader study with presentation of 30 clinical cases to 120 dermatologists. Six diagnoses were offered and votes collected via remote voting devices (quizzbox®, Quizzbox Solutions GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany). Dermatoscopic images were classified by a binary and multiclass CNN (FotoFinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany). Three sets of diagnostic classifications were scored against ground truth: (1) CoHI, (2) individual dermatologists, and (3) CNN. RESULTS: CoHI attained a significantly higher accuracy [95 % confidence interval] (80.0 % [62.7 %-90.5 %]) than individual dermatologists (75.7 % [73.8 %-77.5 %]) and CNN (70.0 % [52.1 %-83.3 %]; all P < 0.001) in binary classifications. Moreover, CoHI achieved a higher sensitivity (82.4 % [59.0 %-93.8 %]) and specificity (76.9 % [49.7 %-91.8 %]) than individual dermatologists (sensitivity 77.8 % [75.3 %-80.2 %], specificity 73.0 % [70.6 %-75.4 %]) and CNN (sensitivity 70.6 % [46.9 %-86.7 %], specificity 69.2 % [42.4 %-87.3 %]). The diagnostic accuracy of CoHI was superior to that of individual dermatologists (P < 0.001) in multiclass evaluation, with the accuracy of the latter comparable to multiclass CNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that the majority vote of an interconnected group of dermatologists (CoHI) outperformed individuals and CNN in a demanding skin lesion classification task.